Skip to Content (Press Enter) Skip to Footer (Press Enter)
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Hoodie Nice hoodie - theu do run on the small side so if you are close in sizes you may want to order the next size larger.
Date published: 2022-03-05
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Hoodie Size runs a bit small , ordered a large fits like a medium
Date published: 2022-03-04
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Great fit. Poor quality. Nice fitting hoodie. But really lost it's color and faded after one wash. And I followed the washing instructions. Disappointed in the quality.
Date published: 2022-03-04
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Hoodie Have been looking for this kind of sweater since my last tour of alaska
Date published: 2022-02-21
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Expected better overall for the price Great quality midweight fabric. I can tell that this will last for a while. However, I have two issues. First, this runs small, I expected this to be both longer in the sleeves and height. The large I ordered fits like a medium. Second, the front near the zipper curls in and out. This is a common problem for zip-ups, but I've owned zip-ups that don't have this issue.
Date published: 2022-01-29
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Good Product Good work hoodie, true to size. I prefer the zip up version instead of the pullover.
Date published: 2022-01-26
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Chest Logo Zip Hoodie This must be a slim fit hoodie because it was my correct size but was too tight. The body and sleeve length were just right but the fit was way too snug.
Date published: 2022-01-25
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Good Quality Fits ok, a size bigger would be better. Nove weight of material
Date published: 2022-01-24
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Chest Logo Zip Hoodie Love the hoodie. Exactly what I needed and description from Dickies was spot on.
Date published: 2022-01-24
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Logo Placement I really like the hoodie, and have no issues with the material, style or fit. However, the Dickies logo was poorly placed high and inside, too close to the zipper. A better placed logo, would probably serve as a more favorable advertisement. Just my humble opinion
Date published: 2022-01-22
  • y_2024, m_4, d_19, h_7
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.41
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_16, tr_14
  • loc_en_US, sid_TWR17, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_dickies
  • bvseo_sdk, dw_cartridge, 21.1.0, p_sdk_3.2.0
  • CLOUD, getReviews, 6ms
  • reviews, product
  • questions, product
  • BV SEO Enabled: QA Not Found
Back to top