Skip to Content (Press Enter) Skip to Footer (Press Enter)
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Cool looking, but they fit weird! The print is so cool! The cut is pretty weird -- the waist is overly roomy and the crotch/butt/hips zone is very tight. Especially in the front, the zipper is incredibly short and there's not much room for anything you might have going on in there. I tried multiple sizes and when I found one where the waist fit, I was worried I'd cut off circulation to my front parts.
Date published: 2022-12-19
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Hard to shop for clothes online Love these prints! Wish they made a while series of different colored prints. I measured my waist and was a tight 36, so ordered the 36. There is about 3 inches of space in the waist. I don't see a 34 waist available, but this would have been the better option for me.
Date published: 2022-12-10
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Good deal Wider throughout the leg than anticipated. Waist is true. Also pattern is darker in person
Date published: 2022-10-21
Rated 2 out of 5 by from No room for the family jewels Pretty tough to wear these as a man, not nearly enough room in the crotch. Bought my usual size and the waist and legs were perfect but the zipper is about 2 inches long and it felt like my sack was being cut in half. Gave em to my girlfriend and she likes em fine though.
Date published: 2022-04-06
Rated 4 out of 5 by from great but forgot about the actual fit cuffs a bit wide; but that might just be me not getting Dickies in a while
Date published: 2021-12-07
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Crowd pleaser You will get compliments wearing these, so get a cool belt to match. The other reviews are correct, these run kinda small in the upper leg area. I got a size or two larger than myself, but I’m still afraid they’ll split if I do lots of bending at work. But they seem durable and I plan to wear them for years.
Date published: 2021-11-27
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Hip Hop Hip Hop The stripes and color way remind me of The low end theory Tribe Called Quest
Date published: 2021-11-18
Rated 4 out of 5 by from This designs creative Pt.2 I am excited about these designs from dickies. I have visited this page numerous times. I would like to see how others feel about it and how it was styled. The workwear trend right now is fun, it’s a different approach for me. If read the caption below. I appreciate Dickies for pushing creative boundaries. But I have to say it again, it’s imperative to cater to other body types. Not just slim. The waist area is too small than normal pants. Overall I am hype about these design on their workwear collection. Good job Dickies IMO on these designs it’s trendy and fun. P.S rate in comfort, fit and 4 because, it’s something Dickies should consider looking into loosening the waist area. It’s really tight.
Date published: 2021-11-07
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Better fit than 874 Dear Dickies, please do better with your sizing. The styling of Dickies pants are not great. Okay. So these are slim pants Dickies. It was a struggle to hook these. Normally I’m a 34, I am glad a sized to a 36. I wish they had shorter lengths, I’m on the shorter and thicker side. If you do squats, any leg athletics be aware. Overall I got them on. The Wester Brown Tiger Print IMO look better than the Blue. They feel snugged in my thighs and back end. I’m sure it will stretch , but still Dickies come on. If your going step into the fashion trend do better with the sizing alterations. Honestly try on pair Dickies, I like these better than the 874s. Hard pass on them.The material is not your regular material also. A little rough but it can do. Price is pretty high, should knock down.
Date published: 2021-10-30
  • y_2023, m_11, d_29, h_8
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.37
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_9, tr_9
  • loc_en_US, sid_WPR25, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_dickies
  • bvseo_sdk, dw_cartridge, 21.1.0, p_sdk_3.2.0
  • CLOUD, getReviews, 5ms
  • reviews, product
  • questions, product
  • BV SEO Enabled: QA Not Found
Back to top