Women's Plus High Rise Fit Cargo Pants
$59.99
Big & Tall size
Big & Tall include sizes starting at 46 waist or 46 length. Products labeled as 3XL and above, labeled as Tall or that includes T for Tall.
Color
Size
Length
Notify Me When Available
Please enter your email so we can alert you when the Women's Plus High Rise Fit Cargo Pants is back in stock. We promise not to spam you. You will be notified only once.
Your Email Address was saved successfully.
We will notify you when this product is back in Stock.
We will notify you when this product is back in Stock.
The Dickies Women's Plus High Rise Fit Cargo Jogger Pants have a proper jogger fit, tapering at the ankle, along with plenty of practical pocketing. Elastic along the back waist provides a comfortable custom fit for easy all-day wearability and straightforward styling that works all year round. This simple style has a tack button closure and dual front slash pockets. The high-rise, flat-front cargo pants also feature rear patch pockets and functional dual-side cargo pockets. These pants are good for both the workplace and the weekend.
Item ID: FPR54W
- Tack button closure
- Dual front slash pockets with bartacks at opening
- Patch pockets at rear with woven logo label
- Dual cargo pockets with hook and loop closure
- Elastic at back waistband
- Elastic ankle hem
- High rise
- Flat front
- Inseam: 28"
- 8.25 oz. Twill, 98% Cotton/2% Spandex
- Imported
Rated 5 out of
5
by
CarolynD from
Cute and comfy
Great fit and comfortable.made well and built to last!I love the style. Are a little long on me but I'm 5'3
Date published: 2023-05-21
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Sharoe from
Okay Overall, Not For Short People
Nice quality pants, however, I would not consider these high-rise pants, especially if you're someone with a bit of a tummy. Very baggy in the ankles to the point where the cuffed ends are pointless. The elastic at the ankles does nothing. Secondly, if you're short these are not going to fit as they do on the model! I'm 5'1, size 16, and these fit me more like baggy snowboarding pants on my frame rather than joggers. The positives are that the quality is good, the elastic wasitband on the back is great, and the pockets are great! Just be wary if you're short and apple-shaped with a tummy. I'm probably on the bigger end of a size 16 and these do fit me just fine, so I would say that the fit is true to size with extra wiggle room.
Also, PLEASE get some plus-sized models for the plus-sized pants you sell?!
Date published: 2023-04-17
Rated 1 out of
5
by
aals from
PICK THE RIGHT MODELS
For the love of God, if the item is plus sized, have a plus sized model in the picture. I bought these thinking they were regular pants, and maybe I’m just stupid, but I was so disappointed and had to return them.
Date published: 2023-04-13
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Bekah231 from
FUPA Approved
As a fat woman, loved these. FUPA approved, and easy to move in for work around the yard. Seems a little thinner material than regular dickies, so summer, spring, and fall approved as well.
Date published: 2023-04-04
Rated 4 out of
5
by
New buyer 36 from
Good fit. Bit thin.
5’4”, 139lbs. Size 16 fits perfectly. Fabric is summer weight. Cautiously optimistic. Would get 5 stars if the crotch/inner thigh area was reinforced for durability.
Date published: 2023-03-31
Rated 5 out of
5
by
gias from
Comfortable
A little baggy in the ankles. Other then that comfortable and relaxed fit.
Date published: 2023-03-22
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Parka from
Teenager approved
Bought a size up not knowing how they’d fit. I could have bought normal size. I got so many compliments on my “fit” that day. (I am a middle aged woman who works at a high school.). My own teenagers approved.
Date published: 2023-03-18
Rated 2 out of
5
by
Gates from
Dickies please make your size chart accurate!
I’m a longtime dickies plus size pants purchaser. Recently their sizing seems to have changed across all of their pants, and it’s frustrating because there isn’t a reliable way to order clothes that fit. According to their current size chart, I should be buying two sizes larger than my normal size. I went one size larger in these pants and they’re a little roomy. For comparison I ordered my normal size recently in the duck carpenter pants and it was much smaller than the same size that I already have and was trying to replace. Seems that the plus size size chart is super inaccurate. These cargo joggers are a bit thinner and lighter weight than the other plus size pants Dickies offers. As others have said these are a bit short. The elastic at the ankle is quite loose and the opening is oversized for the jogger style, it doesn’t look right. There is elastic around the back half of the waistband, so keep the stretch in mind while you guess at a size because that size chart isn’t going to help you much.
Date published: 2023-03-14
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Deanna14 from
Good pair of pants
These pants attract a lot of lint. I also wish they were tighter around the ankle, like a true pair of jogger pants. Otherwise, great fit and very comfortable.
Date published: 2023-03-09
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Heather197 from
Great fit
These pants are on the thicker side, soft and comfy
Date published: 2023-02-21
Rated 5 out of
5
by
KimD3 from
Super cute
These joggers are exactly as noted. Super cute! I really like the fit.
Date published: 2023-02-05
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Adrian2 from
Solid pair of pants
Had to get the waist taken in because I wanted a baggier look, super excited to wear them out! Length works great too, I’m 5’5.
Date published: 2023-01-22
Rated 2 out of
5
by
DM sunshine from
Not what I expected
Runs big. When I was thinking joggger i expected them to be tighter fitting. Very big around bottom.
Date published: 2022-12-27
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Ashbear from
Short
I followed the size chart and ordered a 24(which is 2 sizes bigger than my regular size). The size chart is inaccurate. I’d only size up one size with the way they fit and that’s mostly to accommodate my thighs. They’re also very short. I’m 5’6 and they’re high waters. The ankle has elastic but is so loose it doesn’t make a difference. The length is the biggest flaw in my opinion. I’m not very tall and they’re pretty short on me.
Date published: 2022-12-14